Culture, Science, and Politics: More Intertwined Than You Think
Posted by Kate F. on August 7 2009Wow, it’s August 2009. That means three things for me: (1) un-ending nostalgia as the other volunteers for Hopkins Interactive and I help the Class of 2013 prepare for their move-in via the Hopkins Forums and the Class of 2013 Facebook group, since I was in the same position a whopping three years ago; (2) my 21st birthday is this month; and (3) summer vacation is almost over.
Actually, make that four things: as shown by the previous three facts, I’m no Peter Pan. Time keeps flying by, and I’m growing up more and more (not literally, since I’ve stopped growing taller already) whether I like it or not. Good thing one of the things I want to accomplish in life is becoming a spry and mentally sound little old lady.
<pSpeaking of time flying by, here’s a quick summary of what I’ve done this summer: (1) I went straight home after my last final exam in early May to spend a week packing and relaxing. (2) My family spent the rest of May visiting relatives and family friends in California. (3) I spent the first few days of June unpacking what I had brought on my California trip and packed what I would need to spend two months in Baltimore. (4) I spent two months in Baltimore (namely, June and July) working in my research lab at the medical school, studying for the MCAT (I was originally planning on taking it in September, although I’m now planning to take it in January), and taking a class. (5) I came home to Connecticut just a few days ago, and I love it!
Ta-da! There’s the summary. Of course, there’s a lot more to the five phases of my summer, but it’d take a long time if I were to describe everything in detail. However, if there’s one thing that I can’t forget about this summer, it’s this: I can’t run away from politics. Before I’ll continue, let me clarify something: I’m not politically apathetic. As my close friends from home and Hopkins know, my favorite courses in middle school and high school (besides AP Chemistry) were my history and government courses and I loved engaging in political discussions in those courses; I follow global, national and local news avidly; and I’ve voted every year ever since I turned 18 (and I look up every candidate for every office before I vote–including the local politicians from my hometown).
At the same time, though, I haven’t taken a social science course in college, the closest thing I’ve come to studying something political in the classroom is reading Cicero’s orations in one of my Latin courses (because as you may know, Cicero was a Roman statesman), and my extracurricular activities are more on the artsy, community service-oriented, and multicultural side. The only time I did something remotely political on campus was attending a talk given by Ralph Nader when I was a freshman–and I fell asleep during it. (To be fair to Mr. Nader, it was because I was exhausted that day and seated towards the back of Shriver Hall. I do remember I was awake for parts of his speech.) And when it comes to elections? As some people who know me from home and Hopkins may know, I’m usually never too crazy over most candidates because of my political views, but I still end up voting because I feel very strongly against wasting your right to vote. (That’s another story for another time, though.)
In short, I’m probably not the kind of student at Hopkins who comes to mind when it comes to politics. As I’ve mentioned before in this entry and in my three years of blogging for Hopkins Interactive, my academic pursuits have mostly focused on the natural sciences and the humanities–and my extracurricular pursuits have mostly focused on arts and culture.
However, these interests of mine have proven this summer that, well, you can’t bury yourself in the research lab or twirl away in the dance studio and think you can avoid politics. The reality is that politics affects everyone–not just the people at the very center of it. Anyway, you’re probably wondering by this point: how did I realize this summer that a an ordinary college student who’s not a political activist in any way, shape, or form that she simply can’t escape it? Let’s see…
RESEARCH: Ever since my sophomore year, I’ve normally done research at the Ryugo Lab for credit; however, I was planning on doing research on a purely voluntary basis this summer because I had thought I would need to work in a summer job to support myself in addition to doing research and studying, so I didn’t want to make an academic commitment to research for a certain number of hours. (At Hopkins, if you receive credit for doing research during a semester, summer term, or Intersession, one credit is awarded for every 40 hours of work.) Only weeks before the summer vacation began, though, my P.I. (i.e., “primary investigator”–this term describes the Ph.D., M.D/Ph.D., or even M.D. who runs a research lab) told the other undergraduate researchers and yours truly that he’d just been awarded a grant that would enable him to hire interns–and he offered us to do research for pay during the summer if we didn’t want to do it for credit. We would be paid for every hour. It was perfect for me! I didn’t have to find an extra summer job on top of doing research. Now how does this have to do with politics? The grant that was awarded to my P.I. is one of several grants that have been awarded through the NIH as part of the Obama Administration’s economic stimulus plan, which includes encouraging scientific research. (Several other Hopkins professors have benefited from such grants; you can read an article from the JHU Gazette about it HERE.) It goes without saying that telling people about the source of my paycheck incited different people’s remarks on economic policies and so on.
THE MCAT: No joke. In a practice MCAT exam that I took, there was a passage in the verbal section describing the politics behind the arts. Think about it: up to the 18th century in western Europe, artists such as painters and musicians primarily depended on sponsorship by royalty or nobility for their livelihood. (That’s just one example of artwork being commissioned by political figures, of course. There are countless other examples throughout the world and throughout history–and even the present day.) As the passage on the practice exam noted, after events such as the French Revolution that involved upheavals of governments, revolutionaries often destroyed artwork that they deemed representative of the “old” political institution. They could be portraits of the recently deposed rulers–they could even be paintings on innocuous subjects such as landscapes but still be looted because of the fact they were painted by an artist sponsored by a despised monarch. Like most of the passages in the verbal section of the MCAT, it was a fairly brief one, but it was quite thought-provoking. It also made me recall Beethoven’s Third Symphony–which he had originally dedicated to Napoleon until the general crowned himself emperor, an action that clashed greatly with Beethoven’s political beliefs–and Picasso’s mural Guernica as two of numerous examples of artists independently expressing their political views in their art in one way or another. Political figures don’t just commission artists; artists also express their views on politicians.
ARTS FUNDING: While I spend most of the calendar year in Baltimore, I still keep in touch with the ballet school at home where I studied ballet almost religiously in high school, and I take open adult classes there whenever I am at home. As a non-profit organization, this ballet school is heavily reliant on funding to survive; this includes corporate funds, private donations, and local government grants. With the economic recession, my hometown is considering decreasing its budget, which includes various arts grants it awards–such as grants to this ballet school. Granted, the concept of non-profit arts organizations receiving grants from the government is also something economical and not just political–but still, it’s politicians who determine how much money to award to which non-profit organizations.
SUSHI: Okay, this example isn’t quite an example of how politics influences sushi, but sushi is involved. Anyway, earlier this week, my mom’s family friends decided to host a welcome dinner at a sushi restaurant in Manhattan for two Philippine politicians–Bayani Fernando and his wife Marides Fernando–from my mom’s hometown outside Manila. Mr. and Mrs. Fernando were members of Philippine president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s entourage in her recent visit to the U.S., and the entourage was staying in New York City at the time–hence the sushi dinner. My parents decided to bring my godsister (who was visiting my family from the Philippines until just a few days ago), my brother, and me along to this dinner–and the day before the dinner, they told my brother me the details that I’d just typed.
What they hadn’t told my brother and me was that last year, Mr. Fernando became the first Philippine politician to declare his intention to run for the Philippine presidency in 2010. Furthermore, because he’s of the same political party as the current Filipino president (i.e., Ms. Macapagal-Arroyo) as well as a prominent politician in Metro Manila, chances are that with enough funding, he could run a successful enough campaign to be one of the top contenders for the Philippine presidency. (FYI, the Philippines has a multi-party system, unlike the way the U.S. has two prominent political parties and several third parties.) The issues he’ll be facing, however, is gaining support among people residing in provinces outside Metro Manila and people from Metro Manila who currently oppose him and/or his party. I found out all of this information right there at the sushi dinner, which was basically a crash course in Philippine politics for me. It was hard not to learn all this when (1) Mr. and Mrs. Fernando were making stump speeches towards the end of the sushi dinner asking Filipino expatriates to help Mr. Fernando in his campaign and vote for him next year, (2) several of the Filipino expatriates were taking many photos at the dinner, and (3) my parents as well as my godsister from the Philippines answered the numerous questions I had because I was confused by everything going on around me. (By the way, I’d post a photo from this dinner if I had one, but I currently don’t–at least not yet.)
And to think I had thought this would be a low-key sushi dinner! I enjoy eating sushi, so I was very much looking forward to enjoying the food for its own sake. Oh, well. The good thing about being one of the few American-born individuals at the event was that I didn’t feel pressured to promise Mr. Fernando my vote. If anything, even though more than one middle-aged Filipino adults were trying to tell him that I’m “just an American” (i.e., because I was born in the U.S. and I’m a U.S. citizen, I’m not a potential voter for Mr. Fernando and thus I wasn’t politically important enough for him to talk to) while I found myself standing next to him at one point that evening and having to converse with him in English and broken Tagalog, he still made small talk. It felt like I was talking to one of my uncles or family friends, since he just asked me simple questions like what I was studying in college and what I wanted to do as a career. Not too bad.
*****
The moral of the story? Even if you think you’re just a sushi-loving, ballet dancing, neuroscience researching American college undergraduate, politics play a larger role in your life than you might think–whether you like it or not! It’s just like the way your high school physics teacher (or college physics professor, for that matter) explains to you the reasons why you need to study physics–and that one of them is because of its prevalence in everyday life.
N.B. I found the images illustrating this blog entry from Google Image Search.
Name: Kate F.











